<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Have the Internet Marketing Sharks Killed Squidoo?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bizammo.com/marketing/have-the-internet-marketing-sharks-killed-squidoo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bizammo.com/marketing/have-the-internet-marketing-sharks-killed-squidoo/</link>
	<description>Your Small Business Arsenal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:32:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Bentley</title>
		<link>http://bizammo.com/marketing/have-the-internet-marketing-sharks-killed-squidoo/comment-page-1/#comment-5467</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Bentley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 01:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bizammo.com/?p=205#comment-5467</guid>
		<description>You can get good results from a lens, better than the article marketing sites anyway, but it&#039;s not exactly magic. I&#039;ve seen mainly obscure or long tail keywords gotten this way, but nobody will link to a Squidoo lens that crap so you&#039;ll usually be in PR0 oblivion unless it was an easy phrase to get ranking for anyway. 
   Squidoo has never taken any measurable steps to prevent spam or encourage quality. There&#039;s just no rewards for it, and that&#039;s got marketers using it like a tool, similar to Twitter. To be honest, you could setup a Wordpress domain and probably get more traffic to an entry there than a squidoo lens when it&#039;s all said and done (if you use the right plugins).  I personally don&#039;t like to spend any substantial amount of time posting to a site some other company owns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can get good results from a lens, better than the article marketing sites anyway, but it&#8217;s not exactly magic. I&#8217;ve seen mainly obscure or long tail keywords gotten this way, but nobody will link to a Squidoo lens that crap so you&#8217;ll usually be in PR0 oblivion unless it was an easy phrase to get ranking for anyway.<br />
   Squidoo has never taken any measurable steps to prevent spam or encourage quality. There&#8217;s just no rewards for it, and that&#8217;s got marketers using it like a tool, similar to Twitter. To be honest, you could setup a WordPress domain and probably get more traffic to an entry there than a squidoo lens when it&#8217;s all said and done (if you use the right plugins).  I personally don&#8217;t like to spend any substantial amount of time posting to a site some other company owns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
