I was reading about Google’s pay-per-action (PPA) model being rolled out for advertisers on WebProNews just now. Basically, advertisers can purchase ad space on a cost-per-action (CPA) model rather than cost-per-click (CPC) or CPM models where they pay per impression. By “action,” we mean anything from signing up for a service to buying a product after following the ad. Let’s take a quick look at it from a marketing perspective, and its potential effect on affiliate marketing.
Benefits to Advertisers
It seems that a CPA model would have a very simple benefit for advertisers. Simply put, they don’t have to worry so much about click fraud costing them money without conversions, because they only pay out when conversions actually happen.
Advertisement: Your content continues below.
Your Thoughts on Google’s Pay-Per-Action Ads
Now advertisers can already use this kind of pricing structure through affiliate networks. Do you thinkGoogle’s making a wise move jumping into the fray, or should they be keeping themselves more focused on other areas of online advertising? Do you expect to see advertisers jumping from affiliate programs to Google’s PPA model (or at least slowly migrating, so as not to piss off their affiliates all at once), or do you think they’ll tend to be a bit wary of the idea of putting all (or a larger chunk of) their advertising revenue in Google’s hands? Do you think the PPA ads with Google are an answer to advertiser concerns over click fraud, or do you think the strong arms of Big G are infiltrating another ad arena just because they can?Â Share your thoughts! 🙂